Showing posts with label English. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English. Show all posts

Reviewing The Generation Of Canada English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

In chapter one Handa said “I spent most of my junior and high school years attempting to hide my South Asian identity and being ashamed of it because, on many levels, I knew that my parent’s culture would not be accepted by my white school-friends” (p75). From Handa’s saying we can find out she has feeling about the white school-friends have racism to her or to South Asian people, and also she as a Second-generation South Asian girl has cultural shame. Then she interviews some other Second-generation South Asian girls Pinki, zarah and Nima. Pinki remembers that when she was younger, she felt racism by her classmate. At grade three, a girl gets lice who sat beside her. And all the classmates said Pinki gave the lice to the girl, they checked her hair and nothing fond. Pinki’s experience of racism is from the early years of her schooling. This story is not the cultural shame, this is the racism.

Zarah’s story was happen at grade eight when she was thirteen. At that time she felt so bad, and her self-esteem is down. The causation is her white school-friends used: “Oh my god, they are so disgust--, they are so dirty” to describe her and other South Asian girls. At that time she is felt shame to being an Indian. Right now, they are both going to the multicultural school majority of population being brown and Chinese or the “brown” school. At these school no racism, no cultural shame. They like everyone. This is the way to show that Second-generation immigrant of South Asian girls can’t belong to with white school classmate. For Nima’s experience, this is the totally the discrimination. This is happened when she was younger. She went to her friend’s house and being kicked out by her friend’s mom. “She describes the event of being kicked out of somebody’s house as ‘little’ and argues that because these kinds of occurrences do not happen on a daily basis she is not identify by them overall”. From these three stories, we know the Second-generation immigrant is born in Canada, but Canadians still feel them are different, and feel them are not the same with white Canadians. When they see the brown skin, they always think that’s a foreigner, even you are born in Canada. For Second-generation South Asian women, they want to get equality between with all the other Canadians, they want integrate to mainstream, and want to get a respect by other white Canadians. But they can’t get it, because the racism and prejudice still exist in our society. And the Second-generation of South Asians don’t want to believe that is a racism, because they think they are Canadians too. The Canadians should not to prejudice Canadians. They are the same race with white Canadians, but the fact is not.

Second-generation South Asian women also have some clash in their family with parents. They are not identifying Canadian cultural with their parent’s cultural. Their parents as First-generation immigrant, they have tried the best to fit in this new country (Canada) and new society. So maybe they overlook their children. But for the Second-generation, they are accepting and integration the Canadian cultural. So Second-generation and First-generation have some cultural clash in the family too. In the chapter five, Handa interviews a Second-generation girl Alka. She said she like to going to the day dance but one day when their parents open the mainstream media, and found a article says “day dance goers as wanting to adopt the worst of Canadian value, such as “people drinking on Yonge Street, topless dance…they [youth] want rights with out fulfilling their duties and obligations that go with them” (P114). And they saw some newspapers make a statistics shown in Western world 85 percent of students by the age of 18 have had sex. At once, an Indian local TV following this article to make a whole hour program, it said these kids lay, skip school, girls go out with guys and girls makeup, wear miniskirts, even said these girls look like whores. Also all Indian newspapers have some report about this. After this Alka’s parents don’t let her go to any daytime dance and call the school to ask for the student’s attendance records. The other South Asian students’ parents do the same thing. These parents think the day dances is the place to accommodate young heterosexual women, and it’s a place to attract young heterosexual man. For school, some school before take a non-interventionist stance for day dance, and thinks kids need for enjoyment. But after these South Asian parents censure the school were not fulfilling their responsibility to protect their kids. The school has to make a different standard for South Asian kids and white kids. So the day dance becomes to a cultural clash between Second-generation immigrants with First-generation immigrants. Daytime dace is not the only cultural clash’s battlefield between Second-generation with First-generation. South Asian girl Pinki recollects that one day she wears a khanda on her jacket to dance, and her father asks her to take it off. Because her father though that she is not respectful enough to wear khanda. But she is not respect for their religious, she just want be comfortable. Same like her father though she is not respect their religious because her cuts her hair to short and has a nose ring. Pinki express her own meaning very clear, she says, “Just because I apply this symbol in a non-religious context does not mean I am not respectful of where it comes from.”(p141) So these two generations have clash in social regulation, cultural tradition, even clothing, food, behaviors and from a question of jurisdiction.

For the strengths and weakness,

In conclusion “Second-generation immigrant youth as being caught at a crossroads between their parent’s cultural and the cultural of the dominant society in which they live.”



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Gothic Novel Of Frankenstein English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

Is Victor really playing God in this gothic novel? The author was wrote this novel the summer of 1816.

Like most of the writers in her literary circle, from Lord Byron to Doctor Polidori, Mary Shelley--self-educated and one of the best-read women of her time--was intrigued by old tales and ancient myths concerning lost and outcast wanderers. Jesus' parable of the prodigal son fits perfectly into the Romantic notion of the isolated soul, the tortured, wandering loner who is, by fate or circumstance, cast adrift on a sea of loneliness and despair. In chapter 11 of Frankenstein--the first chapter narrated exclusively by the monster--there is a very subtle yet unmistakable allusion to Christ's parable (Thompson 192).

The novel’s title, “Frankenstein”, or “The Modern Prometheus”, is self-explanatory once you read the book and it allows you to understand why this was chosen by Mary Shelley. Seeing as how this setting is a very gloomy one, it leads one to think about probable evil that will occur. The reader also notices the death of a close relative in the beginning of this novel.

Frankenstein is a product of a period in which the secularization of society placed human beings at the center of the universe. The freedom to pursue independent thought and action however also shifted the responsibility for life's outcomes away from God and Satan. And onto the shoulders of human beings. Victor's "monster" is thus not a form of heavenly retribution for daring to "play God." as many have suggested. The text indicates that whether there is a God or not, Victor is responsible for his own behavior, and ultimately for the deaths of those he loves. His struggle is not with his Creator, but with his own ego. Out of this first assumption comes the primary theme of the novel: With knowledge comes personal responsibility; the denial of responsibility leads to tragic outcomes(Nocks 138).

This particular event shows how unpleasant the story has become already and it’s only a matter of time before the major conflict arrives. Victor shows characteristics of arrogance, guilt, intelligence, and most importantly curiosity. After the incident where the violent storm took place, Victor began showing interests in working in his lab. He became a dedicated student of chemistry and anatomy at Ingolstad. After studying these courses, Victor began his attempt in creating a human being. In this act, Victor is indeed trying to play the role of a higher divine being.

Victor Frankenstein left his family and went away to study. He became obsessed with studying the source of life, and wondered if he could steal "the secrets of nature" to make a live creature. He hoped to help mankind by defeating death, but also believed he would be famous for his discovery and worshipped by his creatures (Hermansson).

Mary Shelley’s gothic writings reveal the peculiar traits in the novel. These traits include the description of the monster’s bizarre and unattractive features, the bone-chilling environment of Victor’s lab, and the feeling that he’s being followed because of his possible psychic connection with the monster. In this chapter, Shelley brought out the fear and grotesque tone, but it is just the beginning compared to the remainder of her petrifying tale.

What Isaac Asimov termed ‘the Frankenstein complex’ the over-reacher's conviction that his creation will turn on him and exact retribution for his contravention of natural law-is always fashionable, in the sense that it can be fashioned and refashioned to suit changing cultural anxieties. Whether or not Frankenstein was written as a cautionary tale, this is undoubtedly the status it has acquired in popular culture, scientific debate and feminist critique (Goodall 26).

When the reader fully understands the subtitle, “The Modern Prometheus”, one will come to the realization that the story is closely related to the meaning. In Mary Shelley’s time ,Greek mythology was popular. In Greek mythology, “Prometheus” was a Greek figure, a Titan in particular, that stole fire from the Gods to give to warm humanity. He was punished for his arrogance much like Victor Frankenstein in a sense. The version of this myth that most identifies with Victor is called “Metamorphoses.” It’s about how Prometheus created a human being from clay in the image of the gods. This connection between Prometheus and Victor Frankenstein is obvious. It indicates how they both created a life.

Although the reference to "man"'s creation from "clay" clearly intersects with the Promethean story, the Christian mythos of Adam's personal relationship with his Creator separates this creation story from the pagan one. As the reader comes to discover, Milton's text plays an important role in educating the Creature to the point at which he can question Victor Frankenstein in much the same fashion--but this parody of Adam receives no consolation from his maker (Duyfhuizen).

In Victor’s lab, he constructs a replica of an 8 foot tall man from parts he collected from dead flesh. This creature that had been created had superhuman qualities like endurance and strength. Similar to the biblical story of Adam and Eve, as God approached making Adam from the rib of Eve, Victor Frankenstein created a living being by corpse remains. He soon finds out that by mocking God, his method turned out to be a regretful nightmare. Victor was completely dedicated on creating this monster that he refused to stop until it was complete.

The characteristics of Victor Frankenstein before the experiment were arrogant, curious, intelligent, and shameful. Needless to say, the curiousness that he showed while he was creating a living being got the best of him. Victor didn’t eat, sleep, and had most certainly had poor hygiene. He shut himself out from the outside world to accomplish this task. Some would say these were the actions of a “mad scientists.” Most would agree because of the certain qualities that scientists portray like dedication. Even though they may have good intentions, like Victor Frankenstein, they can have dangerous or disputable acts. "Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow” (38). By this quote Victor means that the power of knowledge is great, but also dangerous. As the main character continues to mock God, he soon regrets it. Even a God who some may think created mankind can build a living being with the right intentions, but they rarely remain innocent. Victor Frankenstein had the unfortunate pleasure of witnessing his creation turn into a harmful creature. The main character saw his home-made living being standing over his very own bed at one point and the disgust that Victor felt left him in poor condition. This left his old friend Henry to pick up the pieces after spotting him in the streets.

By trying to play the role of God, Victor realized that his creation had made him physically ill and thinks the monster’s grotesque beauty was a mistake. His creation, much like the Christian God, had disappointed him and had done more harm than good. Look around you, sound familiar? Frankenstein’s fascination with anatomy and chemistry had led him down the wrong road.

The world was to him a secret which he desired to divine. Curiosity, earnest research to learn the hidden laws of nature, gladness akin to rapture, as they were unfolded to him, are among the earliest sensations he can remember . . . It was the secrets of heaven and earth that he desired to learn; and whether it was the outward substance of things or the inner spirit of nature and the mysterious soul of man that occupied him, still his inquiries were directed to the metaphysical, or in it highest sense, the physical secrets of the world (22, 23).

Victor experiences a feeling of grief along with guilt. In the popular bible story of Adam and Eve, one has probably read about Eve taking the bite of the forbidden fruit. God watched as his creations had made the wrong decisions and became damned. Same as Victor Frankenstein, God watched as he couldn’t control or do anything about the fact that Adam and Eve were done for as they disobeyed him. Both God and Victor felt helpless, yet remorseful in a sense. This is one of their similarities from what we’ve read. Like God, Victor had made a monster that began its life playful and care free; the qualities you would see in children. As the monsters life progressed, he saw how the shallow society looks upon ugliness and hideousness. Automatically, society is intimidated by Frankenstein’s creation. Little do they know, he is just as intimidated by them. The more encounters of people he experiences, the more bitter and aggressive he becomes. This ferocious beast is so disappointed by his own physical appearance that he blames his creator, Victor Frankenstein. He begins killing off Victor’s close friends and family. Being as superficial as Frankenstein is, he can’t even accept his own creation because of the disgust he feels through looking at him. As the monster was rejected from society, Adam and Eve were rejected from the Garden of Eden.

The creature is bitter and dejected after being turned away from human civilization, much the same way that Adam in "Paradise Lost" was turned out of the Garden of Eden. One difference, though, makes the monster a sympathetic character, especially to contemporary readers. In the biblical story, Adam causes his own fate by sinning. His creator, Victor, however, causes the creature’s hideous existence, and it is this grotesqueness that leads to the creature’s being spurned. Only after he is repeatedly rejected does the creature become violent and decide to seek revenge (Mellor 106).

In the Old Testament of the Bible, Cain and Abel’s story is quite similar though it’s indirect similarities. The hideous creation is like Cain through his rejection from humanity, but he is also like Abel, a victim of someone who has been separated from God and in Victor’s case, a dangerous desire of knowledge. The monster feels a great desire to be accepted.

Shelley's monster is not evil by inherent constitution. He is born unformed--carrying the predispositions of human nature, but without the specific manifestations that can only be set by upbringing and education. He is the Enlightenment's man of hope, whom learning and compassion might mold to goodness and wisdom. But he is also a victim of post-Enlightenment pessimism as the cruel rejection of his natural fellows drives him to fury and revenge (Gould 14).

He thinks he deserves to be accepted although his looks aren’t appealing to humanity in the least. Victor’s creation thinks he can live in this world without being dangerous as long as he got the same respect. Needless to say, this wasn’t the case. As he repeatedly tried to gain moral virtues, society only saw the superficial side of the monster. His outer appearance affected him in more ways than anyone could imagine. His attempt in educating himself made no difference what so ever because humanity will always judge one from the outer appearance. Without one piece of spiritual or religious influence, this creature was learning purely by the cottagers.

The lack of human interaction is really what drove Shelley’s monster to his absolute limit. Frankenstein’s diary played a part in this as well. Once he got to know Victor, his creator, the hostility had already set in. “I learned from your papers that you were my father, my creator, and to whom could I apply with more fitness than to him who had given me life?” (165) Obsessed or extremely fascinated might even be a better term to use as he read the diary over time. In the last chapter, the creature began to detest Victor, his creator, more and more until finally he snapped. There was nothing but revenge and dark thoughts in his mind and he became more disgusted day after day. He thought that aggression or violence was the only way to get his creator’s attention. Once Victor Frankenstein is dead, the creature thinks this is the one only way to start over. After the vengeful feeling is gone, he is free to begin a new life and recreate himself without the constant disappointment that someone is out there who made him hideous is alive. With the attitude that he’s better off to not exist then to exist ugly shows the reader the shallow way of humanity. The sheltered life can trigger this also by the lack of experience in human interaction.

Victor made a terrible mistake by trying to play the role of God. It is clear that knowledge and fascination can be the death of the curious one. It is also clear that revenge can make one think unclearly. Though most might think that Victor’s imperfect creation was the real monster, Frankenstein is not innocent. His intentions of this creation started out as simply an experiment until he got too carried away as would any “mad scientist”. If anyone would notice that his hygiene, poor diet, and rest hadn’t been taken care of properly, they would see that it is indeed the sign of something a little more serious than the dedication to an experiment- an idea. His role in playing God wasn’t exactly as divine as the actual deity. In fact, Frankenstein was a simply careless man who wasn’t under any circumstances concerned about his consequences in this creature. To be accepted in society you have to look a certain way, think a certain way, dress a certain way, and act a certain way. As shallow and superficial as this may sound, it’s true. The modern way humanity thinks, Frankenstein wasn’t considering. If Victor truly wanted to make things easier, there were factors to be examined closely. He knew he had created a monster, and even he didn’t give him a chance to prove that the outer appearance didn’t reflect his inner behavior, along with the rest of society. Shelley expresses the inevitable shallow characteristics of the modern God through Victor Frankenstein.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Great Poet William Shakespeare English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

William Shakespeare was an English dramatist and poet who had touched society from the Elizabethan age, to the next Generation. Shakespeare is known to be one of the greatest poets and playwrights in the world. He wrote about thirty-eight plays, about 154 sonnets, and a variety of other poems. William changed the way plays were written by creating new styles of writing. He is the most widely read of all Authors and the popularity of the Life and Works of Shakespeare, in English speaking countries, is second only to the Bible. His life, his times, and his notable achievements prove he is, was, and always will be important in our society. (www.imahero.com)

William was born in April, 1564, in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. Even though the exact date of William's birth is not known, we celebrate his birthday on April 23. His birthday was chosen to be celebrated on this day because the Church records from Holy Trinity Church show that he was baptized there on April 26, 1564.It was said to be customary to baptize children three days after they were born. William was the third child of John and Mary Shakespeare. He was brought up in a varied class family, with 7 other siblings. (Ashton 10)

There are no records relating to William Shakespeare's attendance at school but much information is assumed as being a reasonable accurate reflection of his childhood, school days, and education. Shakespeare's parents were both illiterate but because of his father’s position in the community, as the Alderman, free education was offered for his children. No one is sure of how long he attended school or how long his education lasted but Nicholas Rowe, who was the first editor of Shakespeare's Works, reported that "...the want of his assistance at Home, forced his Father to withdraw him from thence.” People have made the assumption that William Shakespeare probably attended King Edward IV Grammar School. There he received an education in Stratford from the age of 7 in 1571 and left school and formal education when he was fourteen in 1578. (www.william-shakespeare.info)

William's nickname is "The Bard of Avon." A bard is another word for poet, and William is known as one of the greatest poets in the world. Therefore, he is known as "The Bard." "Of Avon" is added to this name because William was born in Stratford-upon-Avon. When the two names are put together, William's nickname becomes "The Bard of Avon." (www.imahero.com)

The next documented event in Shakespeare’s life was his marriage. At the age of 18, William was given permission to marry. Anne Hathaway, 26 years old, was his new wife’s maiden name and they had three children together. Their first daughter, Susanna, was born on May 26, 1583. The couple later had twins, Hamnet and Judith, born February 2, 1585 and christened at Holy Trinity. Hamnet died in childhood at the age of 11, on August 11, 1596. (www.bardweb.net)

Shakespeare’s life in the theatre began as an actor, but very little is known of the parts he played. It is said that he probably devoted himself more to writing as soon as he could and in any event did not play the principle roles. (Ashton 18) Shakespeare did most of his theater work in a district northeast of London, in two theaters owned by James Burbage, called the Theatre and the Curtain.

William had a talent for writing about the struggles people face. His stories combine conflicts with which both the Kings and peasants could identify. William's plays are placed in one of three categories; Histories, Comedies, or Tragedies. He is a great playwright and his plays often contained elements of all three categories. He blended common issues into histories, seriousness into comedies, and humor into tragedies. (www.imahero.com) His histories and tragedies almost always claim at some level to be true, to be based on real events. Some of his most important and formative influences, such as the Bible and Montaigne’s Essays, are not sources at all, though evidence of their use can be widely found. (Kay 43)

Shakespeare dedicated his long poems Venus and Adenis and The Rope of Lucrece to Southampton, who inspired the majority of Shakespeare’s sonnets, the greatest of all love poems. (Ashton 15) William Shakespeare never published any of his plays so none of the original manuscripts have survived. Eighteen unauthorized versions of his plays were published during his lifetime. A collection of his works did not appear until 1623 when two of his fellow actors, John Hemminges and Henry Condell, recorded his work and published 36 of William’s plays in the First Folio. (www.william-shakespeare.info)

Romeo and Juliet is the most popular play written by William Shakespeare. It is believed that Romeo and Juliet was first printed in 1597. It is also said that the play was first performed between 1594 and 1595. In the Elizabethan era there was a huge demand for new entertainment and the tragedy would have been produced immediately following the completion of the play. Romeo and Juliet was based on real lovers who lived in Verona, Italy who died for each other in the year 1303. Romeo and Juliet has inspired many other works from many other people. (www.william-shakespeare.info)

William influenced the English language more than any other writer in the world. He created over 2,000 new words and phrases. They include: schoolboy, shooting star, puppy-dog, football, bandit, partner, downstairs, upstairs, leapfrog, alligator, and mimic. Shakespeare uses "dog" or "dogs" over two hundred times in his works. His work contains over 600 references to birds of all kinds, including the swan, bunting, cock, dove, robin, sparrow, nightingale, swallow, turkey, wren, starling, falcon, and thrush, just to name a few. (www.nosweatshakespeare.com)

Shakespeare retired from theatre in 1610 and returned to Stratford. In 1613 the Globe Theatre burned down, but Shakespeare remained quite wealthy and contributed to the building of the new Globe Theatre. Shakespeare died on April 23, 1616 and was buried in the chancel of the Church of the Holy Trinity in Stratford. (Greenblatt 179) A monument to Shakespeare was set up on the north wall of the chancel. In Shakespeare's will, he left most of his property to Susanna and her daughter, except for his "second-best bed," which he left to his wife. William was the first writer to be honored. He was a great poet and playwright and a hero in our hearts. (students.roanoke.edu)



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Great Poet Emily Dickinson English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

Emily Dickinson was the greatest poets produced by America. Since Dickinson’s works were published after her death, her life became a mystery. In order to study her life, scholars attempted to interpret her life through reading her poems. There were nearly 2,000 of Dickinson’s poems had been published. The first editor divided the poems into four themes: Life, Love, Nature, Time and Eternity. As a matter of fact, approximately one third of her poems were dealing with the theme: nature. Transcendentalism and woman’s culture were the two influential motives that contributed Dickinson’s interest in nature. Nature actually was the subject of Transcendentalism. Ralph Emerson could be regarded as the representative figure of American Transcendental movement. Dickinson, as a woman poet, reached in an atmosphere dominated by Emerson. She was affected by Ralph Emerson’s Nature which shared the idea of man and nature. Exploring nature as portrayed in Emerson’s Nature and in Dickinson’s nature poems could be discovered to which Dickinson agreed or differed from Emerson’s viewpoints. Transcendentalism encouraged man to isolate himself and got closer to nature. Emily Dickinson also tried to keep aloof from the society and hided behind the open door when visitors come in.

Dickinson’s life in Amherst, her relationship with her parents and her education and reading influenced her writing and thinking. Dickinson grew up in Amherst which was a small and quiet rural town in New England; she enjoyed her entire life in the simplicity of this area. New England meant more to Dickinson than merely a place to live. Her entire life and work seemed to exhibit the close association with the New England environment. “Wild flowers-kindle in the Woods-/The Brooks slam-all the Day-/No Black Bird bates his Banjo-”(Bianchi 103). The experience of coming close to nature was gained in her early years and was limited to the region around Amherst. Dickinson’s intense interest in nature resulted from her intimate contact with it. Her botanical knowledge of flowers and plants, her love for insects and animals, and her personal conversance with the grandeur of the landscape were all recorded in her poems.

Dickinson’s preoccupation with nature may be traced back to her parents’ influence. Emily was born into a prominent family; her father, Edward Dickinson was a well-known lawyer and treasurer of Amherst College. He was conservative about the issue of women’s education because according to the traditional belief, women were not supposed to pursue academic study. Although, Edward Dickinson held fear toward women’s education, he set up a family library for his children, so they can read books for self education. Edward Dickinson also built a garden for Emily Dickinson. This garden offered her a private study place and also kept her in touch with nature. Moreover, Emily took the responsibility for housekeeping because of her mother’s illness. Emily Dickinson’s inspirations were not only from her observation of creatures when she saw them in motion outside the windows, but also from doing the household chores. Emily Dickinson preferred to stay at home. Her reclusive manner of living had the effect of isolating herself from society and bring her closer to nature. The environment that surrounded her enhanced her interest in searching for the meaning of nature.

Emily Dickinson’s initial view of nature was inherited from the New England Puritan tradition. In Dickinson’s childhood, she was educated to embrace the Puritan doctrines of seeing correspondence between the natural and spiritual world. “Edward Hitchcock, president of Amherst College, devoted his life to maintaining the unbroken connection between the natural world and its divine Creator.” Nature was seen as a sacramental sign and symbol. Edward Hitchcock’s lecture inspired Emily Dickinson. Her indebtedness to Hitchcock lies in his instruction and inspiration to explore the beauties and mysteries of nature. Beside Hitchcock’s view of nature, Benjamin Newton guided Dickinson to explore the intellectual and spiritual world of Transcendentalism. “Mr. Newton became to me a gentle, yet grave Preceptor, teaching me what to read, what authors to admire, what was most grand or beautiful in nature, and that sublimer lesson, a faith in things unseen” (153). Newton took an important role in the shaping of her poetic thought. Newton not only exposed Dickinson’s intellectual thoughts but also inspired her to be a devotee of nature. Another important person which influence upon Emily Dickinson was Ralph Emerson. Transcendentalism holds for Dickinson lies in the mystical harmonies of man and nature. Both Dickinson and Emerson reflect their obsession toward natural world. There are some contrasting viewpoints to be found in their works.

In the book Nature, Emerson explains how every idea has its source in natural phenomenon and stresses that only through utilizing intuition can people see the idea in nature. Emily Dickinson and Emerson both reveal their appreciation of the beauty and harmony of nature’s appearance, and both put their emphases on the power of imagination as a way to explore the mysterious bond between man, nature and God.

“ ’Nature’ is what we see—

The Hill—the Afternoon—

Squirrel—Eclipse—the Bumble bee—

Nay—Nature is Heaven—

Nature is what we hear—

The Bobolink—the Sea—

Thunder—the Cricket—

Nay—Nature is Harmony—

Nature is what we know—

Yet have no art to say—

So impotent Our Wisdom is

To her Simplicity. “

As an observer of the natural landscape, the various and intricate features of natural world attract the poet’s attention by means of sight and sound. Dickinson likes to portray the natural beauty around her by a keen perception of the creatures or natural phenomenon. Dickinson’s natural world is similar to which Emerson states in Nature, “A leaf, a drop, a crystal, a moment of time is related to the whole, and partakes of the perfection of the whole. Each particle is a microcosm, and faithfully renders the likeness of the world.” Dickinson seems to echo Emerson’s assertion that each part of nature contains all within it. She also considers the unity of natural objects is more significant than that of individual parts, for nature is “heaven” and “harmony”.

“The Bee is not afraid of me.

I know the Butterfly.

The pretty people in the Woods

Receive me cordially—

The Brooks laugh louder when I come—

The Breezes madder play;

Wherefore mine eye thy silver mists,

Wherefore, Oh Summer's Day?”

In this poem, Dickinson shows her passionate love in playing with these tiny natural creatures through the imaginative power in her delineation. Dickinson is able to envision herself in an analogical relationship with nature. She expresses a close relationship between herself and nature through personification. These natural creatures will give her delight without asking anything of her in return. Dickinson likens the bee to a friend; she marvels at the butterfly’s grace, moreover, she feels at ease with the pretty people in the woods. When she approaches the brook, it will give her a warm welcome. Similarly, in “I taste a liquor never brewed,” the poet also shows her fascination by the natural phenomena and she thinks the nature as a source of pleasure.

Apart from approaching to the natural world in person, Dickinson likes to see everything from the window of her room. The window offers her a vantage viewpoint from which she can perceive the external world without being disturbed.

“The Angle of a Landscape—

That every time I wake—

Between my Curtain and the Wall

Upon an ample Crack—

Like a Venetian—waiting—

Accosts my open eye—

Is just a Bough of Apples—

Held slanting, in the Sky—

The Pattern of a Chimney—

The Forehead of a Hill—

Sometimes—a Vane's Forefinger—

But that's—Occasional—

The Seasons—shift—my Picture—

Upon my Emerald Bough,

I wake—to find no—Emeralds—

Then—Diamonds—which the Snow

From Polar Caskets—fetched me—

The Chimney—and the Hill—

And just the Steeple's finger—

These—never stir at all— ”

In the first two stanzas, Dickinson portrays the specific landscape as it appears when she awakes. The seasonal movement fascinates her and appeals to her by its never-ending outward show. She takes account of the autumn giving way to winter, in which the colors of autumn disappear and are replaced by the evidence of winter. Emily Dickinson also reflects nature’s grandeur landscape in her poetry.

Dickinson’s viewpoint derived from the ideas of Emerson. Dickinson is indulging the romantic tradition of nature poetry on account of the Emerson’s Transcendentalism-the inference about man’s relationship with nature, and the acknowledgment of certain phenomena in the natural world. Not all Dickinson’s view of nature is from Emerson’s view. Dickinson gradually becomes aware of indifferent power of nature toward man, and her feeling of alienation from the natural world.

What mystery pervades a well!

That water lives so far --

A neighbor from another world

Residing in a jar

Whose limit none have ever seen,

But just his lid of glass --

Like looking every time you please

In an abyss's face!

The grass does not appear afraid,

I often wonder he

Can stand so close and look so bold

At what is awe to me.

Related somehow they may be,

The sedge stands next the sea --

Where he is floorless

And does no timidity betray

But nature is a stranger yet;

The ones that cite her most

Have never passed her haunted house,

Nor simplified her ghost.

To pity those that know her not

Is helped by the regret

That those who know her, know her less

The nearer her they get.

The well, as an object of nature, appeals to her as an enigmatic force with its frightening trait. The word “abyss” not only means the immeasurable depth of the well but also indicates a certain distance of nature to men. We can see Dickinson feels a sense of anxiety and terror toward the well. At the end of the poem, Dickinson indicates the alienation between man and nature by asserting “nature is a stranger,” and nature is no longer benevolent to man. Dickinson uses the image of the “haunted house” and “ghost” as a metaphor for the gloomy characteristics of nature. Although Dickinson has an acute power of observation and intensely sensitive mind, Dickinson sill cannot penetrate the innermost secrets of nature because of its mystery and apathy. Moreover, the more Dickinson intends to peer into nature the more frustrated she feels by its alienation and strangeness. Dickinson seems to express her belief that an essential division exists between the natural world and mankind.

Several of Dickinson poems concerning her attempt to establish an interaction with natural world but ultimately fail. Dickinson restates that a separation exists between the natural world and man.

A bird came down the walk: 

He did not know I saw; 

He bit an angle-worm in halves 

And ate the fellow, raw.

And then he drank a dew 

From a convenient grass, 

And then hopped sidewise to the wall 

To let a beetle pass.

He glanced with rapid eyes 

That hurried all abroad,-- 

They looked like frightened beads, I thought; 

He stirred his velvet head

Like one in danger; cautious, 

I offered him a crumb, 

And he unrolled his feathers 

And rowed him softer home

Than oars divide the ocean, 

Too silver for a seam, 

Or butterflies, off banks of noon, 

Leap, plashless, as they swim.

The speaker maintains a certain distance from the bird in these first two stanzas. As an outsider, the speaker can observe the whole scene with regard to the bird’s action. The speaker precisely renders her witness at first, the bird eats a raw worm and then, he demonstrates genteel behavior toward the beetle. This dramatic transitional scene arouses the speaker’s desire to come close to the bird by offering him a crumb. When the speaker is attempting to establish a rapport between herself and the natural object. However, the bird soon senses he is being seen and then he flies away. As a consequence, the speaker fails to make connection with the bird. The poet depicts nature’s cold response to man’s generous treatment can be seen as its indifference to ordinary mankind.

The poem “A Narrow Fellow in the Grass” related to the idea of nature’s alienation to self and man’s limitation in full comprehension of nature’s inner secret.

A narrow fellow in the grass

Occasionally rides;

You may have met him,--did you not,

His notice sudden is.

The grass divides as with a comb,

A spotted shaft is seen;

And then it closes at your feet

And opens further on.

He likes a boggy acre,

A floor too cool for corn.

Yet when a child, and barefoot,

I more than once, at morn,

Have passed, I thought, a whip-lash

Unbraiding in the sun,--

When, stooping to secure it,

It wrinkled, and was gone.

Several of nature's people

I know, and they know me;

I feel for them a transport

Of cordiality;

But never met this fellow,

Attended or alone,

Without a tighter breathing,

And zero at the bone.

Dickinson uses the metaphor to stress the evanescent quality of the snake. She likens the snake moving across the meadow as a boat would move across water. Also, Dickinson focuses on the snake’s instantaneous appearance and flight. Dickinson separates herself from the creatures as “Nature’s People.” She may feel a delight of cordiality toward these creatures of nature, but the snake is an exception. In the last stanza, we see Dickinson deals with the snake as a metaphor of the great adversary of mankind. Her reaction to the snake comes from the feeling of awesome and icy chill it gives her. In conclusion, the snake can be seen as an antagonistic and malicious force of nature. Nature is no longer a friend but an enemy.

From all above poems, Dickinson not only reflects her dubious attitudes toward the benevolent relationship between men and nature but also presents nature’s way as being ultimately strange to mankind and portrays a sense of alienation. Instead of Emerson’s optimism, Dickinson’s attitude toward nature is negative. Further, she negates nature’s benign aspects and perceives it as a force hostile toward humans. On the whole, we see Dickinson seems to experience a radical estrangement between the self and the natural world. She attempts to follow Emerson’s thought but she discovers the distinctions from him. Dickinson believes the man maintains a certain distance from the natural world.

By analyzing Dickinson’s poems, we can investigate the influential force of Dickinson’s unique conception of nature. In the beginning, we need to pay attention to her sequestered life in Amherst. The geography of Amherst tended to isolate it from more developed society. Under this circumference, Dickinson was able to get close to nature and became inclined to withdraw herself from the world. Dickinson’s reclusive manner of living might have led her to search for an understanding of Nature’s meaning. Her entire life in Amherst could be seen as an important cause to cultivate her interest in nature.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Interest Of Films And Books English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

It is fairly common to see a movie based on a popular book.  In fact, in the last few years there has been a lot of films that were made base of a lot of popular novels for example the Harry Potter series, the Twilight Sagas, Journey to the center of the earth, and the Chronicles of Narnia just to name a few. Invariably, there is always a difficult decision to be made by the makers of such films:  How accurate do we keep this movie to the source material? Would it be better to stick word for word to the book, or merely try and keep the same "spirit" as the novel?  The novel Dune is a perfect example of the different attempts of filmmakers to answer this question.  Alejandro Jodorowski decided to completely change the plot and the ideas behind it to fit his own vision of the film (Internet Movie Database).  Ridley Scott wanted to make the sister Alia of the main character Paul the result of an incestuous affair between the main character and his mother Jessica (Internet Movie Database).  David Lynch decided to completely change the characters of the villains into gross, puss spewing monsters.  Dino DeLaurintis and his studio, which produced David Lynch's Dune, made Lynch change an even more important part of the plot: the use of types of weaponry.  They did not like the idea of humans fighting with knives and swords 25, 000 years in the future (Internet Movie Database).  The most recent version, written and directed by John Harrison, decided to go the opposite way as all the former directors who worked on a film version of this novel.  He decided that instead of making his own version of the book into a movie, he would take the book and just move it onto the screen, hence the title of his miniseries, Frank Herbert’s Dune.  But is it really?  Even with the four hours and thirty minutes screen time Harrison had to use for the director’s cut, could he possibly have made an accurate film translation of this novel?  For many including myself, the answer is no.

Character-wise, there are both many similarities and many differences between the miniseries and the book. Physical differences will be ignored.  Paul-Maud'dib Atreides, the main character of both versions, demonstrate how two different people can read the same book and imagine different characters.  In Harrison's miniseries, Paul begins as an arrogant, sullen, self-righteous young boy.  Many critics have complained about this, claiming that the Paul in the novel was absolutely nothing like Alec Newman's portrayal of him (Clemmenson).  They say that Paul was a noble, honorable, happy, and respectful individual.  Neither idea of the character of Paul is completely right or wrong.  The way Herbert wrote those early scenes featuring Paul allow his character to be interpreted either way.  He is shown to be disrespectful of the Reverend Mother Romallo early on in the novel, and he admits to having pulled pranks on his teachers, such as putting sand in Gurney's bed.  He has had no contact with other children his own age, and he has been raised to think he is better than those in lower situations, which can be seen by the reactions of Duke Leto and others when Doctor Kynes forgets to address Paul properly (Herbert 110).  So, while many may disagree with this, the character of Paul in the miniseries was quite like the one in the book, depending on how you read those early scenes with him in it.

 The Lady Jessica is portrayed incredibly close to the character in the novel.  She is a strong and intelligent woman who betrayed her own sisterhood for love, and never once regretted her decision.  She also expresses the right amount of fear of her own children, mixed with the great love she feels for them.  Alia was also very well done.  She was represented as a tormented, yet sadistic young child who was wise beyond her years, and faced both the Fremen, hatred, and awe, because she is the sister of their messiah and also had many "mystical" gifts.  All three Harkonnens, the Baron, Feyd, and Rabban, were also transferred magnificently to the screen.  They were not made into these vile, monstrous creatures like in Lynch's Dune, but were powerful. Machiavellian politicians , while ruthless, were as such for a reason.  As the Baron he says in the book: "I cause pain out of necessity" (Herbert 16).  This Baron of the miniseries is the same.  It is even revealed during the scene The Temptation of Feyd's Uncle (scene 3, The Prophet) that the destruction of the Atreides, who for generations had been the Harkonnen's mortal enemies, was merely a means to an end. This is also taken directly from the novel, however the plan is never fully revealed like it is in the miniseries.  Rabban and Feyd are also like the characters of the book, but that is no real difficult feat as they are both fairly static characters.  Liet-Kynes comes alive in the miniseries, not because of how well he is translated from the book, but because of the great acting job by Karel Dobry.  The miniseries lost most of his inner turmoil, as he had some major issues with his father, who is not even mentioned in the miniseries, even though he is an important prophet to the Fremen that became evident during his death scene.  He also had to deal with his conflicting beliefs as an ecologist and as a Fremen.  As a Fremen he wanted to believe that Paul was his messiah. As an ecologist, the worst possible thing that could happen to his plans for Arrakis would be the arrival of such a "hero".  So even though his character was great in the miniseries he wasn't the same character as in the novel.  The same must be said for other secondary characters like Piter DeVries who, in the novel a sadist, Hasimir Fenring who, in the novel an intelligent, dangerous, but honorable man, Thufir Hawat who, in the novel survives until the very end and is very influential in the plots within plots that were mostly eliminated from the miniseries, Duncan Idaho who, in the novel more of a devil-may-care type person, Princess Irulan who was hardly in the novel at all, but in the sequels a far less intelligent and much weaker character, and Leto Atreides who, in the book a charismatic but cold and calculating leader.  In the end, it seems while Harrison was fairly successful at transferring the major characters to the screen, he failed miserably when it came to the secondary characters.

The script, dialogue-wise, is close to the book.  Most people, after watching the miniseries, seem to comment mostly about the changes in sayings or quotations from the novel to the miniseries such as the repetition against fear, and the "When religion and politics ride in the same cart." , and that is a valid complaint.   Not only were these quotations needlessly changed, but the originals often sounded better.  Also in the script are many lines that were carried over straight from the novel into the miniseries.  Lines such as "they tried and died" (Herbert 13) and "Is it not a magnificent thing that I, the Baron Vladimir Harkonnen, do?" (Herbert 14), are direct lifts from the novel to the film, along with countless other lines.  However, it must be noted that David Lynch's script actually used far more of these lines taken directly from the novel, but unlike Lynch's script, the lines that are taken from the novel in Harrison's miniseries seem to flow more freely and are not nearly so obvious, although there are those that would disagree with that, and believe that in both the movie and the miniseries the dialogue was horrendous (Baker).  

Story-wise, most of the large elements of the plot have remained.  In return, a whole new sub-plot has been added.  This new sub-plot also happens to be the most heavily criticized part of the entire miniseries. The addition of it makes the scenes that were in the novel and omitted from the miniseries even more obvious to fans of Dune.  This new sub-plot in the miniseries focuses on the character of Princess Irulan Corrino, who in the novel is seen only as the author of passages of books which are quoted before each chapter of the actual novel. These passages are supposedly written years after the events of the novel.  She also appears at the very end of the novel, but has no dialogue. During these added scenes she also replaces two other characters in the book:  One, the daughter of wealthy water merchant, who is involved in short lived conspiracy to capture Paul by luring him with sex, and the other being the Lady Margot Fenring, who in the novel warns Paul’s family through a hidden message about a traitor among them.  She is also the wife of one of the most influential characters in the book, even though he himself only is in two scenes of the novel.  In replacing the daughter of the water seller, the small conspiracy involving the attempt to capture Paul is eliminated from the film, and in replacing Margot Fenring, not only is her warning to the Atreides omitted from the film, but also is a bit of foreshadowing and characterization for Paul, which showed the difference between the Atreides and Harkonnen, the villains of the novel.  Margot's husband, Hasimir Fenring, who, as stated earlier, was one of the most important characters in the book, is in the miniseries, but his importance is greatly diminished.  In the novel he is a "potential Kwisatz Haderach", but due to some genetic engineering that left him a eunuch, he failed (Herbert, 473). He is the most dangerous man in the universe and the only one who could kill Paul.  It has been argued that the real climax of this book is not the fight between Paul and his cousin, Feyd Rautha Harkonnen, but between Fenring and Paul, as Fenring decides whether or not to kill the boy after the fight.  He decides, in the end, not to because "Here, finally, is a man worthy to be the emperor’s son." (Herbert, 487)  Another major omission from the story is Paul’s seemingly endless battle against what he sees as the inevitable future and his ultimate acceptance of it.  This future, of course being the jihad which would go on to kill over 90 billion people, all in his name.  This inner turmoil is seen a bit in the scene Sayyadina- The Consecration (scene 26, Muad'Dib), but only for a few short moments, and the Jihad itself is only mentioned in The Test (scene 3, Dune), and then only in passing.  In the novel Dune Paul’s battle with the Jihad   is one of the major focuses, as it is the key to the survival of the human species.  It is rather disconcerting to see it minimized so much in the miniseries.  Another eliminated story element is the reason behind the Emperor's betrayal of the Atreides.  In the novel the reason the Baron is given, and that several of the Atreides suspect, is that the Emperor moved against the Atreides because the Duke was becoming a very popular man in the Landsraad.  This is also the reason used in the miniseries (An Elegant and Vicious Plan, scene 6, Dune).  In the novel, though, this is a lie.  The Emperor actually moved against the Atreides because they had managed to train a small fighting force that was "within a hair" (Herbert, 374) as good as the Emperors Sardaukar terror troops.  This scene adds yet another level to the already complex political machinations in the novel, and the deletion of it serves to simplify the story somewhat.  Another couple of deleted sub-plots include: Feyds gladiator fight, where he and Thufir orchestrate a plot to turn Feyd into a hero, and Feyd wonders if Hawat is going to betray him with his own plot within a plot and have him killed.  Hawat and Gurney's exchanging of information through smugglers. Piters having to decide which he wants more: The Lady Jessica or the planet Arrakis.  A huge section of Paul and Jessica's escape from the Harkonnens, including a mid-air fight in an ornithopter, and attempted rape, Duncan arriving to rescue them more than once, and leaving again.  Duncan destroying a large Harkonnen force using a body shield, the whole Fremen and Sardaukar rivalry (in the novel the Fremen are already better fighters than the Sardaukar, the Fremen respect the Sardaukar ability to fight, and the Sardaukar hate the Fremen and begin a program on Arrakis against them), the use of artillery and the Fremen attempts to capture them, the capture of Thufir Hawat and the price of the Fremen loyalty to him, which includes the water of a dead Atreides soldier, the importance of the constellation Maud'dib which, due to a continuity error, is also referred to as a shadow in the first moon called Maud'dib, the image in the second moon of a fist and it's religious significance, the inner conflict Paul is experiencing between his love for his mother and his hatred of what he perceives she did to him, this anger he has for her can be seen in several scenes, such as The Legend of the Kwisatz Haderach, scene 12, The Prophet but is never verbalized as it is during several of Paul’s prescient visions in the novel.  

In the end, Harrison does seem to have tried to import the book onto the screen.  In many ways he is successful.  He just was not successful enough.  While he succeeded in transferring the main characters to the screen, he failed in transferring the secondary characters.  While he succeeded in keeping the basic story of a young boy who becomes a messiah, he failed to keep such important aspects of the story like the importance of ecology, the book was originally going to be a story about an ecologist, and is dedicated to ecologists.  While he managed to keep religion as one of the most important parts of the story, he failed to show the results of this religious fanaticism, the Jihad, which is one of the most important aspects of the novel.  While he managed to import some lines from the novel into the miniseries, he needlessly changed others for no apparent reason.  In the end, while Harrison did a decent job at keeping the miniseries true to the book and making it an entertaining miniseries, this is still merely an "adaption".  It is not the book on film, like Harrison claimed with the title.  It is not Frank Herbert’s Dune, it is John Harrisons Dune.   The only way we could ever see Frank Herbert’s Dune is if Frank Herbert himself directs his famous novel.

Work Cited

Baker, Kage. “Letter to Mervius”, http://www.kagebaker.com/ January, 2001.

Clemmenson, Christina. "FilmTracks." http://www.filmtracks.com/titles/dune_tv.html.. Web. 26 May 2010.

Harrison, John, dir. Frank Herbert's Dune. Adapt. John Harrison. New Amsterdam Entertainment, 2000. DVD.

Herbert, Frank. Dune. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group, 1965. Print.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Film The Land Of Eyes English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

The Land Has Eyes is a film by a Rotuman filmmaker who is also an anthropologist at the University of Hawaii. The film begins with a scene that describes the founding of the island where a group of people comprised of seven brothers and one sister is shown arriving at the island of Rotuma. One of the brothers has raped the sister and she is abandoned on the island with very little in the way of provisions although she does have a couple of breadfruit trees and a suckling pig. The brothers then leave the island and state that they are heading for Fiji. The story continues and this sister who we now know as a Warrior Woman, ruler of the land and the sea, is pregnant with the child resulting from the earlier rape between her and her brother. The film notes that future generations of women on Rotuma will carry her mana and spirit.

After this first scene, the film shifts the focus back to the present day lives of a family that lives on the island. The main character is a young girl named Viki and the film intensely reveals the everyday lives of Viki and her family. The family seems to be working mainly as wage laborers collecting coconuts and then using the copra meat inside to sell for funds upon which to live. It also seemed apparent that there was also an aspect where the father also may have been a tenant farmer because the neighbor made mention of 'how do you get rid of a neighbor you don't like? You take him to court for filching coconuts!' This actually happens in the movie and the father is found guilty of taking the coconuts by the colonial administrator due to the erroneous translation provided by the friend or cousin of the neighbor who accused Viki's father. This then results in the father and the family being disgraced in the eyes of the community with a conviction ending up with a rather heavy fine of ten pounds. The remainder of the movie shows what happens to Viki after her father dies and she wins a scholarship to go to school in Fiji as a result of her hard work in studying at the local school.

This film has a fairly substantial number of instances where the cultural traditions of the island of Rotuma are the focus of the film. In one scene, I believe the father states that our ancestor says 'The land has eyes and teeth, and knows the truth.' By this statement, it appears that the father is referring to the fact that even if the rest of the community believes that he is guilty of the transgression of stealing the coconuts, the land knows what really happened and will in a way protect him and his family from this unsubstantiated accusation. In the end, the land will take action to revenge the illicit actions of his neighbor who is attempting to get him off his land by making him unable to pay the fine which will result in the loss of the land.

The character of Viki fairly often seems to channel or talk to the Warrior Woman as a way in which to deal with the various trials and tribulations of daily life that she has to deal with both within and without her family ranging from her relationships with the teacher at school, her friends around the neighborhood, her siblings and family, as well as the problems of a young girl who is maturing and becoming a woman. This sort of communion or prayerful communication with the Warrior Woman spirit is a way of responding to the troubles that Viki finds both herself and her family in as the result of other's actions in the film.

Another example of cultural traditions as shown in the film arises when the girl Viki tries to talk to her father about appealing the court's or rather, the Administrator's order of a fine of ten pounds because she knows that the translator, Poto, has lied and feels that the father needs to take action to retrieve his good name in the community. The father responds that 'I've been shamed enough!! We'll deal with this the Rotuman way!' By this, it seems to mean that the father will rely on the cultural traditions or the spirits of the ancestors to resolve this situation of his unjust accusation of having stolen the coconuts.

One more instance of cultural traditions being shown in the film seemed to be the importance of the relationship between the brother and Viki. They seemed to have a special relationship where the brother-sister bond was very special as has been demonstrated in class when discussing these types of relationships in the cultures of the Pacific. The brother always seemed to be looking out for Viki and when he got in a fight over the false accusation where he was defending his father, Viki was right there to help him both by trying to pull the other guy off the brother but also by consoling him after the fight was concluded.

Just prior to the wedding scene and during it, there were also several occasions where you could observe cultural traditions at work. One of these involved the old woman coming to the father to borrow money and the staff for the wedding. She needed money for a costume and the father readily gave her quite a sum which the wife objected to somewhat strenuously. The old woman also made note of the importance of the staff by saying 'The staff is the last one on the island' and you could tell its importance to the old woman and the high level of desire she had to have its use at the wedding. The father, more or less, tells the wife that it is his obligation to help his relative by letting her borrow the money and staff and he does not seem disturbed, as the wife is, that he will be giving a small sum to the church. At the wedding itself, there are some cultural traditions that are shown including the scene where both the bride and groom are being bound in the preparations for the wedding. Also, there is an occasion at the wedding where the old woman makes the chief kneel down in front of her which is supposed to be a reference to remind the Chief to the link to the Warrior Woman who is the founding spirit of the island.

One final use of cultural traditions in the film was shown where the mother was training one of the daughters to do the traditional duties of a woman in the domestic area while the other daughter, Viki, who was good at school was being prepared to go away to Fiji so that perhaps she could one day be a high wage earner and help to support the parents after they reached old age. However, the early death of the father seemingly negated this aspect of the planning. Although it must be said, the mother herself would still need to be supported once she became an old woman and Viki's schooling would certainly help with this necessity.

Overall, there are many instances in this film that disclose the cultural traditions of the island of Rotuma. These range from the wedding ceremony antics, the brother-sister relationship, the calling upon the Warrior Woman in times of need, and the ceremonies that were used during the scene at the gravesite when the father was buried.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The House Of The Spirits English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

The role of the siblings in the works ‘The House of the Spirits’ by Isabel Allende and ‘Like Water For Chocolate’ by Laura Esquivel.

Man being a social animal cannot remain in isolation, he needs to have people around him with whom he can share his both joys and sorrows. The people around him can be his friends , his relatives. One such relation which helps a person overcome various difficulties in his life is that of brother and sister or that shared between two sisters. Such a relation finds expression in Isabel Allende’s , ‘The House of Spirits’ and Laura Esquivel ‘Like Water for Chocolate’.Both the works have brought out the importance of brother- sisterhood in the story and in the life of the characters in the works. The works has many relationships of siblings which play important roles in making the plot an interesting one.

Isabel Allendes’ in ‘The House of Spirits’, revolves, around many relations one such is that shared between, Esteban Trueba (Clara’s husband) and his sister Ferula. These siblings share the same miserable childhood, have similar temperaments – an exaggerated capacity for anger and a hefty amount of pride – and even love the same woman. But while Esteban enjoys a "destiny that [is] bright, free, and full of promise," Férula has to stay locked up at home, tending to their sick mother. Esteban gets to get married and gets to sleep with Clara, while Férula can only spy on them from behind the bedroom door.

All this led to a relation that was slightly away from the ones shared by the siblings is that of Clara and Ferula, in which Ferula was misunderstood for her excessive fondness for Clara. She had a genuine sisterly love for Clara, and Clara also understood Ferula’s feelings but Esteban and the world didn’t. Ferula used to take care of the house while Clara used to meditate and used to be busy with the Mora sisters and her other spiritual group partners, and Ferula never used to mind to do all the house hold work because she used to handle everything when her mother was ill and take care of the household before her mother died.

“Clara was the one in whom she confided her most subtle feelings, and to her she consecrated her enormous capacity for the sacrifice and veneration. She once was bold enough to tell her how she felt, and Clara wrote in her notebook that ferula loved her far more deeply than she deserved or than she could ever hope to repay. Because of the excessive love, Ferula did not leave Tres Marias.”

Even when Ferula was dead, the spirit of ferula especially came to meet Clara at Tres Marias. These things prove that ferula had love of a sister for Clara. The narrator (Alba) tells the readers about the sisterly love for Clara of ferula in the work by writing

The next in line would be that shared between Blanca (Clara’s daughter) and her brothers who are James and Nicolas(Clara and Esteban’s children) but Blanca, the beautiful hypochondriac, is a complete romantic – her great accomplishment in life is her love for Pedro Tercero García, whom she finally manages to live with in Canadian matrimonial bliss. The twins Jaime and Nicolás have little in common with one another. Nicolás inherits the nomadic and entrepreneurial tendencies of his Great Uncle Marcos, while gentle Jaime displays a fierce intellectual idealism that is all his own. So nothing is common in these siblings born of the same mother, Clara .one thing that was common between both the brothers was their love for Amanda. Jaime secretly also loves Amanda but never says it for the sake of his brother’s love for her. Blanca was more close to Jaime as he was more sensible and focused in life and was always around in town. He was totally opposite to who was an adventurer. But the thing which these brothers and Blanca had in common was that they hated their father Esteban Trueba, because he never did any good to his children.

Amanda (Nicolas’s girlfriend) also had a brother named Miguel who grows up to become the lover of Blanca’s daughter Alba. Amanda and Miguel were orphans, but Amanda used to take care of Miguel as a mother and took him everywhere with her. She never let him out of her sight. A quote which can be example of this loving relationship is: -

“Amanda and Miguel embraced tearfully in the doorway of the school, the teacher was unable to loosen the little boy from her sister’s skirt to which he clung tooth and nail, shrieking and kicking anyone who came near him.”

This quote surely expresses the deep love and affection which these siblings shared with each other.

The other work Like Water for Chocolate, which is a very easy flowing and lighter work. But at the same time it is full of emotions and family issues and talks of relationships between sisters. The tragedy in the novel is that Rosaura (second daughter) gets married to Tita’s (youngest) love of life (Pedro) because Mama Elena doesn’t allow Tita to marry him. The youngest daughter is not supposed to marry until the mother dies. Tita was deeply in love with Pedro. But Mama Elena being a strong personality and Tita being scared, lets Rosaura and Pedro to get married. However, the only reason Pedro marries Rosaura is because he could then be closer to Tita.

Rosaura was supposedly the next generation of Mama Elena. She used to follow all the family traditions which Mama Elena also followed. This was one reason why she never had good relations with anyone, especially her sisters. Tita and Rosaura never had a very healthy relationship, Rosaura knew that Tita was madly in love with Pedro but she still went ahead and married him because of which there was a cold war between them. When Rosaura had her first child Robert, Tita breast fed him because Rosaura didn’t have mother’s milk to feed her child. Tita also fed Rosaura’s second child Esperanza. One of the conversations which Rosaura and Tita had which shows the hatred for each other was when

Rosaura says “From now on, I don’t want you feeding her again; never again……All she can get from you is a bad example and a bad advice.”

Tita replies “I’m not going to allow you to poison your daughter with those sick ideas you have in your head. I’m not going to let you ruin her life either, forcing her to follow some stupid tradition”

Whereas, Tita had very healthy and a loving relationship with her other sister Gertrudis. Gertrudis understood Tita’s pain and love for Pedro so she was always there for Tita whenever she needed her. She was the one who took the step to force Tita to tell Pedro that he was going to become the father of her child which Tita was reluctant to tell.

Whereas, Gertrudis and Rosaura had no bonding with each other, because Gertrudis was always more close to Tita. Even when Gertrudis came back after a long time when she ran naked in the fields to quench her heat of love and lust after eating Tita’s rose petal dish, Rosaura welcomed her very casually which showed that they were never very bonded mentally with each other.

The following quote proves that, Gertrudis and Rosaura did not have a very healthy sisterly relationship whereas, it also shows the love and affection which Gertrudis has for Tita. The following extract is conversation in between Tita and Gertrudis when Tita tells her that she is pregnant with the baby of Pedro.

Gertrudis says “the truth, the truth! Tita, the simple truth is that truth does not exist; , it all depends on a person’s point of view. For example, in your case, truth could be that rosaura married Pedro, showing no loyalty, not caring a damn that you really loved him, that’s the truth, isn’t it?”

In the end I would I like to say that, in both the works elaboration has been done on the importance of siblings. Each of the relations above are very important for the work’s story and the flow of it. The nature and the role of the characters make the work more exciting to read and As a reader there is an over flow of emotions. These authors of these works kept the readers attached with the story because there was an excitement in reading what was going to happen next.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Studying The Harlem Renaissance Period English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

(James) Langston Hughes began writing in high school, and even at this early age developing the voice that made him famous. Hughes was born in Joplin, Missouri on February 1, 1902, but lived with his Grandmother in Lawrence, Kansas. Hughes grandmother Mary Sampson Patterson Leary Langston was prominent in the African American community in Lawrence. Hughes’s grandmother was unable to give Hughes the attention he needed, so he began to feel hurt by both his mother and father, and was unable to understand why he was not allowed to live with either of them. These feelings of rejection caused him to grow up very insecure and unsure of himself. When Langston Hughes’s was thirteen, his grandmother died and he moved with his mother and step-father in to Lincoln, Illinois. According to Hughes, he wrote his first verse and was named class poet of his eighth grade class. When his step-father found work in Cleveland, Ohio the rest of the family followed. Soon his step-father and mother moved on, but Hughes stayed in Cleveland in order to finish high school. His writing talent was recognized by his high school teachers and classmates; Hughes’s first verse was published in the Central High Monthly, a sophisticated school magazine regularly (http://www.asalh.org/bhb.html). Typically, a young man of mixed race is caught disastrously between the black and the white world, but especially between longing for acknowledgment by his biracial father and being disowned by him (Rampersad, Arnold, pg2). Langston Hughes died of prostate cancer on May 22, 1967 (http://www.redhotjazz.com/hughes.html). Langston Hughes was a poet that was influenced by the Harlem Renaissance period.

In some respects he grew up a motherless and fatherless child, who never forgot the hurts of his childhood. In his life, as well as in his art, Langston Hughes laughed so often that the tragedy of his earliest years, which is the way he remembered them, was finally almost always hidden. Although many people relaxed before his boyish glamour, a perceptive few also glimpsed an original unhappiness behind his chronic chuckle and ready, remarkable laugh, or intuited in his many sentimental gestures, especially to the young the memory of early pain. Far from being spoiled with love and care, Hughes grew up with a wrenching sense of having been a passed-around child who craved affection but received it only in episodes. This unappeased hunger left him- in spite of his gift of laughter- a divided man. Hughes was caught in the cross fires of being black and white, especially because he was not acknowledged by his biracial father (Rampersad, Arnold, pg2). Hughes had taken up this theme so often that he was unconsciously drawn to it. In his autobiography “The Big Sea” Hughes smiled and smiled and gave only hints of his ambivalence toward his mother. “My grandmother raised me until I was twelve years old,” he wrote, “Sometimes I was with my mother not often.” From the start Langston saw little of his mother, but much of the road-on which he would spend a great part of the rest of his life (Rampersad, Arnold, pg3). Not long after, he left his grandmother in Lawrence; Hughes began a precocious discovery of loneliness (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 4).From the start Hughes saw little of his mother but much of the road on which he would spend a great part of the rest of his life. In mid-July he and Carrie Hughes, his mother, were in Buffalo, but he had begun to plan a move to Cuba, then a “protectorate” of the United States. By July, him and Carrie was pregnant again and probably unable or unwilling to travel overseas (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 10-11). At least once, by his own admission, he ran away from home, because he found life with his mother to be unpleasant. His mother’s failure to reconcile with Jim Hughes, his step-father, had left her bitter. Jim Hughes sent Langston money on several occasions, but it was barely enough for him to live on (Rampersad, Arnold, 12).

There were happier times. Even as a child, Langston was his mother’s son in his passion for the theater and the road. They took the train together to Kansas City to visit Dessalines Langston, who ran a barbershop on Charlotte Street in the city. Langston never forgot his first visit the rattle of the train wheels, the bellow of the brakemen, the clanging bells at the bustling station, and at the end of the journey wonderful food at his “uncle” Des’s and, at last, the music hall, where Hughes’s own lifelong love of the theater was born. In Topeka, Kansas his mother took him regularly to the public library, a small but impressive ivy-covered stone building on the grounds of the state capital, he was entranced by the bright silence of the reading room, the big chairs, the long smooth tables, the attentive librarians who fetched books at his command. He learned to read and write his first surviving letter concern’s a book. His most memorable early encounter with segregation came in the late summer of 1908 when he was ready to start school. When the principal, Elis Foster, refused to admit him, she appealed directly to the school board, argued her case, and won (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 12). In mid-April, 1909 before the end of first school year, his mother withdrew Langston from Harrison and returned him to Lawrence and his grandmother. His mother himself was off to Colorado Springs, Colorado, where on a visit that summer the boy saw unforgettable mountains.

At the end of the summer, however, he was back with his grandmother in Lawrence. By this time, his grandmother had taken him to Topeka to hear a speech by the greatest colored man in the world Booker T. Washington. On another trip, his grandmother and he went to Osawatomie, Kansas on August 31, 1910 for the dedication of the John Brown Memorial Battlefield. With the spirit of John Brown at hand, former President Theodore Roosevelt delivered his almost radical celebrated “New Nationalism primary of humanity over property rights, and called for a powerful central government (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 13). His grandmother stayed home and forbade him to go out afterschool, because of her hatred of segregation. Since blacks were not allowed to attend the church of their choice, they did not attend church at all.

When Hughes entered the second grade of the Pinckney school in the late summer of 1909, he joined the other black children of the first three grades in one classroom supervised by a black school teacher. By the middle of the school year Hughes often cried for his mother to come and take him to Kansas City, where she nom lived. When she could, Carrie Hughes came to Lawrence to fetch him, or meet him at the train station in the colored bottoms section of the city. Together they saw plays, not all of them for children: Under Two Flags, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Little Lord Fauntleroy, and Buster Brown. They attended the opened afforded his ticket, Langston howled in disappointment; the theater was in his blood. (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 14)

Feeling his mother absence as rejection, Langston dropper deeper and deeper into fantasy. From his grandmother, too, came little warmth; he had out her tales of heroism. Accustomed to measuring her words, she now hoarded them; he would remember her, finally, as kind but: old, old. As Langston Hughes got older the university building at the top of the hill he discovered the morgue of the medical school. Admitted by mischievous students, he stared in fascination as they lightheartedly cup up and cavers. He returned again and again to watch them. (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 14)

All his life Hughes would be fascinated by death “Dear Lovely Death,” as he called one of his collections of verse, “that takes all things under wing”. Hughes would also so richly assert the joy and the social purposes of life that most of his reader s seldom notices. Once Langston mother came from Kansas City for a Sunday school concert, no prompting could make Langston start his memorized speech. He went further when Carrie presented a program of dramatics at St. Luke’s Church. As “The Mother of the Grace; “, Carrie wrapped “togas” around her son and another boy who were supposed to stand pitifully on stage while Cornelia, celebrated for her devotion to her sons, lamented their fate. Whether or not he saw Carrie’s choice of roles as ironic, he ruined his mother’s show. (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 15)

Hughes life with his grandmother was not much more pleasant. Mary Langston’s situation had become desperate. Langston never forgot his humiliation when another boy, passing the summer with in Lawrence, wrote home pleading to return because Mary Langston served mostly dandelion green. Mary Langston’s economizing led, however, to a friendship that would be of great important to the man that Langston would become to know. In 1909, 1913, and 1914, according to city directories, Mary Langston lived not at her home but at 731 New York Street in Lawrence, Kansas. About the age of twelve, he found he found his first job; he gathered maple seed and sold it most likely to the Barthelme’s seed company on Massachusetts Street. Then he started to deliver the Saturday Evening Post and a weekly new paper, almost certainly the Lawrence Democrat,(unlike the Daily Journal). (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 17)

Meanwhile, he had established himself as a student. Leaving the segregated classes at Pinckney, he entered the integrated New York school (on New York). In at least one monthly report, his fifth grade teacher marked him “excellent” in each of his eleven subjects. Entering the seventh grade at the Central School in 1914, Langston passed into the care of a white teacher who decided to institute segregated seating in her class. She either compelled or induced all the black children to move to a separate row. (Rampersad, Arnold, pg 17)

Hughes worked various odd jobs, before serving a brief tenure as a crewman aboard the SS. Malone in 1923, spending six months traveling to West Africa and Europe. In Europe, Hughes left the SS. Malone for a temporary stay in Paris. During his time in England in the early 1920s, Hughes became part of the black expatriate community. In November 1924, Hughes returned to the U.S. to live with his mother in Washington D.C. Hughes again found work doing various odd jobs before gaining white-collar employment in 1925.hughes got in employment in 1925 as a personal assistant to the historian Carter G. Woodson at the Association for the study of Africa American life and history. Not satisfied with the demands of the work and its time constraints that limited his writing. (Desantis, Christopher C., pg 40)

Hughes quit to wok as a busboy in a hotel. It was while working as a busboy that Hughes would encounter the poet Rachel Lindsay. Impressed with the poems Hughes showed him, Lindsay publicized his discovery of a new black poet. By this time, Hughes’ earlier work had already been published in magazines and was about to be collected into his first book of poetry. The following year, Hughes enrolled in Lincoln University, a historically black University in Chester Country, Pennsylvania. There he become a member of the black Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, a black Fraternal Organization founded at Howard University in Washington D.C. Thurgood Marshall who later became an associate justice of the supreme court of the United States, was an alumnus and classmate of Langston Hughes during his undergraduate studies at Lincoln University. Hughes earned a B.A. Degree from Lincoln University in 1929. He then moved to New York. Except from travels to areas that included parts of the Caribbean, Hughes lived in Harlem as his primary home for the remainder of his life. (Desantis, Christopher C., pg 41, 42, and 43)

Hughes First published in the Crisis in 1921, the verse that would become Hughes signature poem, “The Negro Speaks of Rivers”, appeared in his first book of poetry, “The Weary Blues” in 1926. Hughes’ life and work were enormously influential during the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s alongside those of his contemporaries, Zora Neale Hurston, Wallace Thurman, Claude McKay, Countee Cullen, Richard Bruce Nugent, and Aaron Douglas, who collectively created the short lived magazine “Fire”. Hughes and his contemporaries were often in conflict with the goals and aspirations of the black middle class, and of those considered to be the Midwives of the Harlem Renaissance, W.E.B Du Bois, Jessie Redmond Faucet, and Alain Leary Locke. The men of the Harlem Renaissance accused of being overly fulsome in accommodating and assimilating Eurocentric values and culture for social equality. A primary expression of this conflict was the former’s depiction of the “low –life”, that is the real lives of blacks in the lower social – economic. (Bernard, Emily)

The superficial divisions and prejudices based on skin color within the black community. Hughes wrote what would be considered the manifesto for him and his contemporaries published in the nation in 1926, “The Negro Artist and The Racial Mountain”. Hughes was unashamedly black at a time when blackness was démodé, and he didn’t go much beyond the theme of black is beautiful as he explored the black human condition in a variety of depths. Thus, his poetry and fiction centered generally on insightful views of the working class lives of blacks in America, live throw his portrayed as full of struggle, joy, laughter, and music. Permeating his work is pride in the African American identity and its diverse culture. (Bernard, Emily)

Hughes was quoted saying “My seeking has been to explain and illuminate the Negro condition in America and obliquely that of all human kind”. Therefore, in his work he confronted racial stereotypes, protested social condition, and expanded African American’s image of itself. Moreover, Hughes stressed the importance of a racial consciousness and cultural nationalism devoid of self – hated that united people of African descent and Africans across the globe and encouraged pride in their own diverse black folk culture and black aesthetic. Langston Hughes was one of the few black writers of any consequence to champion racial consciousness as a source of inspiration for black artists. His African American race consciousness and cultural nationalism would influence many foreign black writers, such as, Jacques Romani, Nicolas Gullies, Leopold Seder Sorghum, and Amie Creasier. (Bernard, Emily)

Hughes was, with the exception of Richard Wright, the black writer most identified with communist left during the 1930s, it was undeniable. Hughes’s frequent publication of “revolutionary” poetry in the journals and press of the CPUSA, his activity in communist – initiated campaigns. In fact what is formally most interesting about Hughes’s poetry in the 1930s in that the wide variety of voices, styles, and themes employed by Hughes in the 19202 and the early 1930s and addressed to equally disparate audiences becomes largely unified by the end of the decade. This process of unification results in Shakespeare in Harlem (1942) and, ultimately, Montage of a Dream Deferred (1951), in which formerly distinct addresses and addresses are combined to imagine a single audience and a single subject. To draw on Bah tin’s discussion of the novel, if a diversity of speakers and auditions could be said to be retained by Hughes, this diversity is contained within a single volume in a dialogic relation rather than in different volume and journals speaking to different audiences. (Smethurt, James)

The range of addresses and addresses in Hughes’s poetry reached its zenith in early 1930s. During this period Hughes largely abandoned the types of poems that had made his 1927 “Fine Clothes to the Jew” so notorious in the black press. Poems formally rooted in the secular and sacred musical forms of the blues and gospel music, as well as in black rhetoric and representing as speaking subjects such “low life” character as prostitutes, gamblers, murderers, drunks and suicides. Instead Hughes’s published poems fell into three general categories aimed at three relatively discrete audiences; “up life” and comic poems aimed largely at an African American audience that was outside the cultural orbit of the CPUSA, and outside the groups of black intellectual’s associated. (Smethurt, James)

The same year Hughes established his theater troupe in Los Angeles, his ambition to writer for the movies materialized when he co-wrote the screenplay for “Way down South”. Further hopes by Hughes to write for the lucrative movie trade were thwarted because of racial discrimination within the industry. Through the black publication Chicago Defender, Hughes in 1943 gave creative birth to Jess B. Semple often referred to and spelled simple, the everyday black man in Harlem who offered musings on topical issues of the day. During the mid 1950s and 1960s Hughes’ popularity among the younger generation of black writers varied as his reputation increased worldwide. With the gradual advancement toward racial integration, many black writers considered his writings of black. Hughes wanted young black writers to be objective about their race but not Otto scorn it or flee it. He understood the main points of the Black Power movement of the 1960s, but believed that some of the younger black writers who supported it were too angry in their work. Hughes’s posthumously published Panther and the Lash in 1967 was intended to show solidarity and understanding with some skill and devoid of the most virile anger and terse racial chauvinism some showed toward whites. (Olson, Charles, pg 19 and 20)

Near the fourth of July, Hughes at last needed Noel Sullivan’s entreaties and travelled north for a short visit to Carmel-by- the-Sea. There he was very warmly received at “Ennesfree” by Sullivan himself, Marie Short, Robinson and Unna Jeffers, Ella Winter, Lincoln Steffens, Martin Flavin, Albert Rhys Williams, and others in the old circle. The political tension of the previous summer had faded away. The JOHN Reed Club itself was dead- killed, ironically, not by vigilantes or the American Legion but, across the nation by decree of the Communist Party, which suddenly had found the club no longer a suitable vehicle for its radical goal. Here he continued work on his stories with Arno Bontemps. Butt their board bandit; an editor called the story dull and prosaic, and said that with to authors it suffered from a shifting point of view. (Rampersad, Arnold, pg307 and 308)

Langston Hughes was, in his later years, deemed the "Poet Laureate of the Negro Race," a title

he encouraged. Hughes meant to represent the race in his writing and he was, perhaps, the most

original of all African American poets. On May 22, 1967 Langston Hughes died after having

had abdominal surgery. Hughes' funeral, like his poetry, was all blues and jazz: the jazz pianist

Randy Weston was called and asked to play for Hughes's funeral. Very little was said by way of

eulogy, but the jazz and the blues were hot, and the final tribute to this writer so influenced by

African American musical forms were fitting. (www.kanasaheritage.org)

Work citied

Black History Bulletin. Association for study of African American Life and History.

D.C.

Rampersad, Arnold. The Life of Langston Hughes Volume1: 1902-1941 I, Too, Sing America. New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press 1986.

Desantis, Christopher C. Fight for Freedom and other writing on Civil Right (collected words of Langston Hughes, Volume 10). New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press 1986.

Bernard, Emily (2001). Remember Me to Harlem: The Letters of Langston Hughes and Carlvan Vechten. 1925-1964.

Smethurst, James. The new Red Negro: The Literary Left and African American Poetry, 1930- 1946. New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.

Olson, Charles. Projective Verse. “The New American Poetry”. New York: Grave, 1960. Ed. Donald M. Allen.

Rampersad, Arnold. The Life of Langston Hughes Volume 2: “I Dream A World”. New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

English Poetry Cpt

Danielle Iaboni

Mr. Ventrella

ENG 3U1

May 7th, 2013

An Insight into My Life through the Words of Robert Frost

Charles Simic, a Serbian-American poet, once said that, “Poetry is an orphan of silence. The words never quite equal the experience behind them.” In saying this, Simic infers that the memories behind every line in a poem that a reader reads are in no comparison to actually living through them. Poetry always portrays experiences, themes, or even nightmares that have a much more powerful meaning than the words themselves. Poems by Robert Frost, the man who supposedly reinvented poetry, are filled with his own personal experiences. Growing up, Frost took quite a while to figure out what his true calling was as he attended multiple universities, and battled the death of many of his loved ones. As he lived a rough life, many of his writings are very easily related to by many of his readers. As a teenager in high school, I find the poems “The Road Not Taken” concerning decision making, “God’s Garden” depicting faithfulness, and “The Armful” regarding overwhelming problems by Robert Frost easily relatable to my past, present and future.

Decision making is a crucial part of growing up and Frost’s “The Road Not Taken,” reflects the type of person I want to be. All decisions in life have two main choices: the easy way out or the hard way out. Within the first two lines of the poem, “Two roads diverge in a yellow wood/ And sorry I could not travel both,” (1-2) Frost explains that he makes his own life based on the decisions that he makes. By comparing the two roads diverging to the choices one must make, Frost gives the reader an understanding of what he might be going through. There is virtually no way of going back. At the beginning of 2009, I came across the decision of quitting basketball. I was to give it up all together and play another sport, or continue playing despite being cut from the provincial team. With such a heavy burden on my...



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Reviewing The Gravity By Sara Bareilles English Literature Essay

The essay examples we publish have been submitted to us by students. The essays are the student's work and are not examples of our expert essay writers' work. READ MORE

See how we can help

Sara Bareilles is an American singer, songwriter, and pianist. She grew up in Eureka, CA, and at the age of 18 she moved to Los Angeles, CA to pursue her career (Sara Bareilles). According to She is a graduate of UCLA’s Communication Studies Department. While in high school, she performed in community productions and also high school events. Although she was involved in numerous singing acts, she never had any training in either voice or piano. Bareilles has been a songwriter for almost all of her life. Her two first works, “Star Sweeper” and “I Love a Parade,” didn’t win her any Grammies, but they are a representation of the fact that she has been song writing for a very long time (Sara Bareilles).

According to Bareilles’ biography on Vh1.com, she began to perform in local bars and open-mic nights after she graduated college. After gaining enough confidence to feel comfortable on stage, she began to perform at local venues and musical festivals. She had made a CD, and began to shop it around and eventually signed a deal with Epic Records in April of 2005. A produced by the name of Eric Rosse worked with her the following February to help perfect her record. They worked on the record just over a year. Sara Bareilles second album was titled Little Voice and released in July 2007. Her first single “Love Song” and the album reached the Top Ten after being released (Sara Bareilles). She has been awarded four Grammies; two in 2008 and two in 2009.

“Gravity” was originally written for Bareilles first album entitled Careful Confessions (Careful Confessions). After she was signed to Epic Records and teamed up with Eric Rosse, the single was added to the track list for the album Little Voice. Gravity was written in the early 2000’s. During this time there were many events happening which included George W. Bush being president, the major terrorist attack in New York, George Harrison died and the war in Iraq began (United States Timeline).

These events probably didn’t have much effect on Sara Bareilles reason for writing “Gravity.” Not much was found for her reasoning, but it was possibly based on past relationship that she has had, or a reflection on either one or multiple relationships.

The overall theme of “Gravity” is how one can be drawn toward another person in their life, even if they don’t want to. Sara Bareilles starts the song by “Something always brings me back to you, It never takes too long, No matter what I say or do, I still feel you here ‘til the moment I’m gone” (lines 1-4). Here she is saying that there is a force that is making her return to someone in little time, and it doesn’t matter what she does to stop this or go in a different direction because there is always a feeling that she has that wants to be near, let’s say, this man that is drawing her near.

The second verse is “You hold me without touch, You keep me without chains, I never wanted anything so much, Than to drown in your love and not feel your rain” (lines 5-8). When she says “You hold me without touch,” she is saying that she can feel him even though he is not there. “You keep me without chains,” means that he can control her without him even trying to. The last two lines can be translated into that she has a strong feeling to want to be embraced in his love and not feel like she can’t have it. The reason for this is because when you are drowning, you are fully covered in water, and when you are being rained on, you just get glimpse of water and you’re not fully drenched in it.

The chorus of the song is “Set me free, leave me be, I don’t wanna fall another moment into your gravity, Here I am and I stand so tall, I’m just the way I’m supposed to be, But you’re on to me and all over me (lines 9-13). When the song goes into the verse, it seems that the song is switching gears a little bit. She wants to be set free from this force that she is feeling. She doesn’t want to be pulled into him anymore. She wants to be her own person without him, but she feels it may be impossible to stop this force.

The third verse is “You loved me ‘cause I’m fragile, When I thought that I was strong, But you touch me for a little while, And all my fragile strength is gone (lines 14-17). She is saying that she thought she was strong enough to not need a man in her life, but she was actually weak, and all the strength she thought she had went away when the man came into her life. After the third verse the chorus repeats.

The hook is “I live here on my knees, As I try to make you see, That you’re everything I think I need, Here on the ground, But you’re neither friend nor for, Though I can’t seem to let you go, The one think that I still k now, Is that you’re keeping me down, You’re keeping me down (lines 18-26). This is the climax of the song. She is explaining that maybe she thinks she needs to have him in her life. He is not a friend or an enemy, but she can’t let him not be a part of her life, because he is what keeps her sane.

This song goes through multiple ups and downs. The artist seems to not be sure what this man is to her in her life, but in the end she comes to the conclusion that he is what keeps her grounded.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com