Showing posts with label Civil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil. Show all posts

Emancipation Of The Slaves During The Civil War History Essay

Essays in this volume present an introduction to history of the emancipation of the slaves during the Civil War. The slaves are shown to have shaped the destiny of the nation through their determination to place their liberty on the wartime agenda. Essay examines the evolution of freedom in occupied areas of the lower and upper South. The struggle of those freed to obtain economic independence in difficult wartime circumstances indicates conflicting conceptions of freedom among former slaves and slaveholders, Northern soldiers and civilians. Essay demonstrates how the enlistment and military service of nearly 200,000 slaves hastened the transformation of the war into a struggle for universal liberty, and how this experience shaped the lives of former slaves long after the war had ended.

In the aftermath of the Civil War, the slaves were actually freed. and including President Lincoln, played in freeing the slaves.

The upshot is that it not only demystifies Emancipation, which in any case, was an "evolutionary process" rather than a single "discrete act," it also puts a lie to the accepted legend that American whites were so "freedom-loving" that they fought a war entirely to ensure the freedom of the slave. Despite the well-worn and accepted legend that it was "Lincoln who freed the slaves," the facts revealed in the first essay (as well as in the logic and reality of the social conditions surrounding the war revealed there) -- tell quite a different story. The gates of freedom were simply blown off their hinges and sprung open because no one was available to close them. They were simply left to inhale it on their own accord entirely as an exigent byproduct of the "fog" of the Civil war. And importantly, the fact that whites on neither side of the war could do much about it, does not in and of itself make them, de facto, champions of black freedom. Had they been able to do so, the gates of freedom would have surely been securely slammed shut again. Put simply, the barn gate of slavery had been blown open as a result of the chaos of the war, and the slaves had simply walked out and into the breeze of freedom -- such as it was at the time. Both the North and the South, emancipation was entirely forced upon whites in both regions by the exigencies and the chaos of the Civil War. Thus, the actual "freeing of the slaves" was not a single act as is often depicted in traditional American history.

It was not a heroic single act of white American magnanimity, or an enduring act on their part -- evidence of an ever-dying love for freedom. There is no evidence in the historical records to be found that supports the thesis that whites on neither side of the war, including Lincoln himself, ever had any definite plans of freeing the slaves as a single act of emancipation.

Quite the contrary was true in fact: Whites, whether north or south, were never actually enthusiastic about ending slavery even when they were "backed" into a corner and no longer had a choice in the matter. Nor were they ever openly supportive of it, even when it seemed clear that it would happen no matter what they felt or did about it. And most importantly, even the Abolitionists, who DID support freeing the slaves (for their own selfish moral and religious reasons), were not at the time supporters of making the freed slaves citizens of the US And on this very point, it should be mentioned that even in the North it is a little known fact that freedmen there were often denied US citizenship.

To wit, Lincoln did not even agree to allow blacks to fight in the Union Army until it was an absolute military necessity, and then did so only with the greatest of reluctance. But more importantly, and this is the most telling point of all, just as had been the same case during the Revolutionary War, slaves who fought for Lincoln's Union army (or for the Colonists Revolutionary army, or the army of the Confederacy for that matter) were not freed!

Blacks, who fought on the side of the Americans with General George Washington, were not freed and made citizens of the US as a result of their heroism in the war -- even while, at the same time, the British side was offering both freedom and British citizenship to the more than 100,000 slaves who fought on the British side. The best the "Americans" (the champions, as it were, of white only freedom) could muster was a promise of exile to their own black only colony somewhere else in the world, or a future unspecified timetable for their eventual freedom in the US Which, as subsequent history has shown, were both, in any case.

The truth is that in both the North and the South, emancipation was entirely forced upon whites by the exigencies of the Civil war. After the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation by Lincoln, the slaves of America were free. This was a huge step in making our country truly free to all people. The construction of the South did not however work out smoothly for the freed slaves. After President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, former slaves took on a new role in American society. This role was one of more significance and self worth than in slavery, but this class of freedmen was anything but appreciated. Without the manpower of the slaves, the south's agricultural society would fail, and without the agriculture there would be little money or food in the south. The passing of the Louisiana Black Code in 1865, confirmed that whites felt as if blacks could not handle the responsibility or the rights of true citizens. Whites thought they did not deserve these rights because they were inferior to themselves and simply less than human. It was almost as if slavery had never ended.

Many blacks remained on farms and plantations because they did not know what else they could do after emancipation. However, many were being forced into staying because few knew anything other than farming. Some slaves however would do anything just to leave the farm. Even kind masters lost many slaves due to the want and need of freedom. Outsiders made independence nearly impossible though. The sharecropping system, in which most had worked before, was still the only employment available and certainly the only work blacks knew as familiar. Rural merchants tried to give blacks a chance for employment, but often forced them into a position where they would sharecrop.

Some positive effects on the black community following the war. Black family and social life began to improve. Family structure turned toward a more traditional model, with the man at the head of the household completing most of the manual labor. Many blacks soon wanted to be educated and literate. Many public schools, supervised by the Freedmen s Bureau, were built so ex-slaves and their children could be educated. Black churches also offered a place where blacks were given an environment in which they could participate. Funds were raised for schooling and Republican policies were supported in these churches. By 1865, black ministers assumed political roles and the first black conventions were held.

During the Seventeenth, Eighteenth and part of the Nineteenth Century the White people of North America used the Black people of Africa as slaves to benefit their interests. White people created a climate of superiority of their race over the Black African race that in some places, still lingers on today. The American Civil War however, was a key turning point for the Black African race. Through their actions and the political actions of President Lincoln and his administration. Whites felt that the Civil War was a war started upon the White Man's issues and what possible reason would the Black Man have for wanting to fight in this war. On the contrary The Black Man saw The Civil War as an opportunity to win freedom and gain respect. Blacks in the North who were free from slavery willingly pledged their service to fight in the Union Army however, their allegiance was denied by President Lincoln on political grounds. Lincoln realized that the issue of Black soldiers would be intolerable by the public and would not be accepted. Initially, the Union Army utilized Northern Blacks from the Free states to relieve Whites from daily tasks that were essential to maintain the armies, thus freeing up White soldiers for battle. As the Union Armies began to move further into Confederate territory however, they encountered many runaway slave Blacks. These Blacks were the ones that contributed most to the Union effort. This was true for two reasons. First, there were many more Blacks in the South compared to the North, roughly four million compared to two hundred thousand. Secondly, the Black people in the South had more at stake; once they left the Confederate side to join The Union there was no turning back. Not only would they be deemed as traitors but runaways as well and were likely to face death if they where caught.

The effects of this failure to provide a secure place in the American economic, social and political system for its "freed" slaves, still have deep ramification that are felt painfully even today.

As we can see, freedom for the blacks did not come directly as a result of the emancipation proclamation. And there were plenty of obstacles and people who tried to stop them. Freedom also meant the chance to reunite with lost family members. The end of slavery meant that African Americans could more closely fulfill what they saw as appropriate gender roles. However, slowly and surely the black community earned their right to be recognized.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Involuntary Labor During The Civil War Period History Essay

During the Civil War, an argument prolonged across the world about slavery. This topic became commonly known during the same time as wage labor arguments. Some people who worked with wage labor, said both, slavery and wage labor, owned the freedom and dignity of the workers.

Abolitionists, (those who were against the pro-slavery agreement), did not cooperate with wage labor opponents because they believed that slavery was substantially worse than wage labor. President Lincoln agreed with these abolitionists because in his perspective, the wage laborers had more of an opportunity to gain freedom rather than slaves because wage laborers were capable of escaping easier. Labor advocates desired abolitionists to expand their conception of sovereignty for the anti-wage labor cause. However, while most anti-slavery politicians did not do that, free labor remained a forceful power for the North in the Civil War, involving not only wage labor, but also to slavery and free soil in the West.

Pro-slavery supporters discussed that if everyone of the slaves were set free, there would be a widespread of unemployment and chaos. In their terminology, chaos meant uprisings, bloodshed, and anarchy. Those who were pro-slavery began engaged in an argument which was led by the Abolitionists. The pro-slavery movement used references including history, religious values (bible), economics, legitimacy, common good, and sympathy, to add accuracy to their arguments. Those who wanted to keep slavery argued that the dramatic end to the slave lifestyle would have had a profound and murderous economic influence in the South where the dependence on slave labor was the institution of their country. They argued for the extension of the status quo, which was providing prosperity and strength for the lower class and for all free people who relished the reward of the slave society. Those in agreement of pro-slavery also stated that slavery had occurred throughout history and that it was part of human nature. They mentioned the Greeks, the Romans, and the English owned slaves. They said that in the Bible, Abraham possessed slaves. They had pointed out in the bible, many references where it had contained the subject of slavery. They noted one of the commands bestowed by God through the Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's…man or female slave...” (Exodus 20 17-18). In the New Testament, they cited that Paul gave back a fugitive slave to his master. However, they preached that even though slavery was commonly known all over the Roman world, Jesus Christ had never said it was wrong. Those in favor of slavery argued that the society was delightful, and that it bestowed Christianity to the heathen from across the ocean. In this argument, slavery was a good thing for the imprisoned. People who agreed with pro-slavery argued that slaves were healthier and well cared after when compared with the poverty of Europe and the recruits in the Northern states. They said that their masters would look after and maintain them when they were ill and elderly, unlike those who were unemployed and had to strive to care for themselves without a helping hand.

During the Kansas-Nebraska disputes, the pro-slavery movement collided with the free soil movement. Although the Missouri Compromise limited slavery in some areas, many others sought for an area open to admired sovereignty, where the residents of the land would choose whether they wanted to be a slave or free state. Lincoln disagreed with this policy, however, on distinctly moral grounds. He briefly stated how there is no moral right in correlation with making a man a slave.

However, numerous free-soilers had distinct intentions for wanting the sections of territories to remain free. One of the reasons was the discrimination against African-Americans; they plainly did not feel like sharing their area with blacks. Some slave-masters believed that African Americans were biologically lower standard to their masters. During the 1800s, this argument was relatively critical. Slave territories established a threat to the free labor society. Without free territories in the west, wage laborers would not have any expectation of traveling west to buy an inexpensive farm and settle in. The North and South attempted to negotiate on the issue by respecting each other’s regulations. For instance, the North gave back fugitive slaves, and the South respected the constitutional rights of free African-Americans, but the majority of these superior deeds ended with the Dred Scott decision. This assessment made slavery national and liberty private, for it enforced free states to distinguish slavery. Hence, pro-slavery arguments were brought attention to the court that every black-not just slaves-had no authorized position as a person in our courts-they were possessions, and the Constitution confined the slave’s rights as a possession of their master. At that point, it then became obvious that America would not manage to survive half-slave, and half free. Therefore, when a society constructs revolving around any institution, just as the South did around slavery, it will gather up as much information as possible to support the key elements of its argument. The southerners remained very confident when voicing their opinions on the case even as the political tension escalated because they believed they had collected valuable pieces which were accurate. Their confidence is what lured citizens closer to the Civil War as well as being more engaged in more historical events.

My opinion is that I believe that one should have a voice to choose which side tends to be more accurate and wise especially in a topic like slavery. The Abolitionists and the pro-slavery groups are of great importance in the history of the Civil War and of Slavery. Those, in these two different movements, had tough decisions to make. They had the choice of embracing slavery or to be against slavery. In addition, they, as citizens, had a decision to voice their opinions why they felt slaves should or not be slaves or to be silent. Though they had many choices to make, they would have to be very wise when stating their beliefs because their decisions would change the world forever as well as the lives of others. As far as the argument goes, I think that every man deserves better than slavery. In my viewpoint, I believe every man was born free; thus, that makes them equal, under God. Though the defenders of slavery said Jesus never stated that slavery was wrong, I do not assume that that is correct. For in the bible, it states, “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise” (Galatians 4:3 24-30). God never liked slavery because he, like myself, believed everyone was created in his image and were equal. He also showed how he disliked slavery by using Moses, as a messenger, to lead the Israelites out of cruel bondage and slavery of Egypt to a land filled with milk and honey. Many aspects of the bible contained slavery but that was what happened during the days before Christ. If I engaged in this argument, between anti-slavery and pro-slavery, I would have chose anti-slavery because I believe no man or woman should be forced to labor involuntarily for that of another human being by being a slave.



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Civil Liberties

Evolution of American Government Responses to National Security Crises; Civil Liberties restrictions during these crises.

Student’s name

Course name

Course number

Instructor’s name

Date of submission

Introduction

Like the history of civil right, civil liberties have been a story of struggle even in time of peace. Americans seamlessly negotiate between the demand of liberty and order and security demands. But, during the times of emergency claims of security and order become immersed and conflict of demand becomes intense. From the past experience we are in open minded crisis and we cannot expect the recent vigorous view of civil liberties that have been embraced recently to exist without any alteration. Every crisis in history has led to condensation of individual liberty, and some of them are justified and unavoidable. However, most them the state have used more seriousness in the mission than it is emergency required

Citizens who life during the crisis need to understand that civil liberty is not a gift from the state in which it can withdraw during the time of inconvenience. . It is an outcome of continuous effort, which have survived for the last two centuries and must prevail the next third during the times of crisis and tranquil- to ensure citizens their personal freedom.

U.S constitution guarantees all citizen civil liberties through the Bill of rights. But the bill of right has little impact to the life of most American citizens since the first century. Even after disregarding the extremely bad violation of human rights and liberties that was inflicted to both free African American and enslaved, Native Americans, Chinese, and other immigrant groups, and the timely limitations of women’s rights and civil liberties abridgement were routine and severe. Many published books and censored newspaper were banned by the local government. The society was subjected to the rigid public behavior and decorum and criminalizing unconventional...



This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com

Africa Americans and the Quest to Attain Equality and Civil Rights

Below is a free essay on "Africa Americans and the Quest to Attain Equality and Civil Rights" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

African Americans and the Quest to Attain Equality and Civil Rights
The Fight for African Americans to end segregation, discrimination, and isolation to attain equality and civil rights has been a long hard and more often than what we would like to think a somewhat violent campaign. One would think that something as simple as the treatment of another human being would be a simple thing to accomplish. However, as we can see throughout history it has not been as generation after generation, have taught their children to hate and for what?   Something as simple and ridiculous as the color of one’s skin, this consequently became a vicious cycle of hatred and intolerance.   We have to ask ourselves, how, did we come to a place where one race felt they were superior to not only African Americans, but American Indians and Asians as well based solely on the color of their skin.   W.E.B. Dubois quote “This widening of the idea of common humanity is of slow growth and today but dimly realized. We grant full citizenship in the world commonwealth to the Anglo-Saxon and Latin ... half deny it to the yellow races of Asia, admit the brown Indians to an anteroom only ... but with the Negroes of Africa, we come to a full stop, and in its heart, the civilized world, with one accord, denies that Negroes come within the pale of 19th century humanity" (Aubrey L 1999).   This quote summed up the way people thought during that time and the state of mind people   had towards persons of different races. Therefore, with this said we come to the question of whose responsibility was it to end segregation, discrimination, and isolation to attain equality and civil rights?   Should the African Americans have had to bear this burden alone, or should they have had to rely on a government divided on race issues to make this a reality?
In order for us to fully understand the journey African Americans have had to make to come to now have equal rights in the 21st Century we have to take a glimpse back... Read Full Essay

Anti Essays offers free essay examples to help students with their essay writing.

Sign Up for free to view this essay on Africa Americans and the Quest to Attain Equality and Civil Rights.

Submitted by: shamikac on May 27, 2013Category: History Length: 1,684 wordsViews: 8

This is Preview only. If you need the solution of this assignment, please send us email with the complete assignment title: ProfessorKamranA@gmail.com