In this section, our central hypothesis takes attention. The hypothesis will be made to bring the information together so that the scientist to make a preliminary statement on how the variables in the study may be related. Another purpose of this hypothesis is to provide a framework for reporting results and conclusions of the study.
For these reasons was made the next hypothesis that give the researcher a direction of investigation and go directly to the especial points which it considered relevant.
The first hypothesis put "students who have not as native teachers are affected more than students who have teachers as mother tongue in second language acquisition"
This hypothesis pretend to explain that if a student studying French in English, this process will be affected in a negative way just because of the absence of native teachers.
The second hypothesis could be "A greater presence of native teachers, bigger and better results will be in the second language acquisition"
This hypothesis is a hypothesis that the two present correlational variables. One of the dependent variable and the other an independent. Set the hypothesis that one variable increases, the other also.
The third hypothesis, that "those students who have more contact with native teachers have a better accent and a better fluidity than the students who have less contact with native teachers"
Means when a student has a real encounter with a native teacher, he or she can develop better communication skills and also can improve their pronunciation in either French or English accent.
That last hypothesis may be mentioned "With native speaker teachers in language Department can provide more benefits than disadvantages to the students studying modern languages major"
The last thing it shows that this gives more ...
Essays
Hypothesis.
